Rainbow Response Updates

Check out what is happening with Rainbow Response and LGBTQ intimate partner violence. 

Rainbow Response in the classroom!

posted Feb 25, 2012 3:45 PM by Rainbow Response Administrator

The Board of Directors is excited to announce that the Rainbow Response Coalition will be featured in the soon-to-be released textbook, The Social Dynamics of Family Violence by Angela Hattery and Earl Smith. The Coalition’s advocacy work will be featured in the chapter “Violence in Same-Sex Couple Families.” The textbook is expected to be released in early March.


For more information on the textbook visit: http://www.westviewpress.com/HatterySmith/index.php

Shaping minds and changing the future – teaching issues of partner violence

posted Jul 28, 2011 7:17 AM by Rainbow Response Administrator   [ updated Jul 28, 2011 9:05 AM ]

Recently Rainbow Response was contacted by a teacher who teaches middle school health and utilizes our resources page when teaching on domestic violence. Ms Gracie Lee and her students suggested we add a resource in which they found helpful in their learning process. http://www.datehookup.com/content-violence-in-dating.htm

While this page has limited information, the information it provides describes some of the complications facing victims of partner violence. However, what I find most encouraging about this site is that it is a post from a dating website. Yes, we all know we have been down that road. The advent of internet based technology, the mobile web, and endless phone apps has led to an increasing use in dating sites for people to find and meet others. I will admit that I myself am a member of a dating site. That being the case, I find the fact that this website has a link to a page on dating violence yet another positive step in the movement to increase public awareness and ultimately reduce the incidents of partner violence.

For me however, what is more exciting than a dating site including information on dating violence is the fact that 7th graders are contacting Rainbow Response to add a resource that they have found helpful to their learning process. I whole heartedly believe that education is key to ensuring that communities, families, and survivors have the knowledge to mobilize and advocate for a world without partner violence.

Rainbow Response is honored to have been contacted by Ms. Lee’s class and would like to thank them for setting such a wonderful example for their peers. We wish the best to Ms. Lee and her students as they continue to learn and educate others on this important issue. Education is an important foundation in the fight to rid the world of partner violence. Rainbow Response hopes that others can learn from the positive example Ms. Lee and her students’ set in ensuring the reality that ALL those impacted by partner violence are included in the educational dialogue.

 

Paul Ashton

Treasurer

Rainbow Response

Domestic Violence and the Holidays. What do you say?

posted Nov 23, 2010 7:29 AM by Thomas Buckley

From the blog: Domestic Violence and the Workplace. Original posting December 18, 2009 by Kim Wells. Click here to read the article.

June in Bloom: June Crenshaw's journey to self-acceptance has helped her find ways to guide women still struggling in the closet

posted Sep 14, 2010 7:03 PM by Thomas Buckley   [ updated Feb 25, 2012 3:45 PM by Rainbow Response Administrator ]

by Yusef Najafi; MetroWeekly; Published on September 1, 2010 <Original Article>

In June Crenshaw's world, every minute matters.

The 49-year-old lesbian from Tulsa, Okla., who has been living in the D.C. area since the mid-1980s, has to carve out time from her full-time career as an IT project manager for her various roles in the LGBT community.

Beyond the day job, Crenshaw juggles three volunteer positions: serving as chair of Whitman-Walker Clinic's board of directors, as a member of the advisory committee to the Mayor's Office of GLBT Affairs, and as co-chair of theRainbow Response Coalition.

She's also a mother.

Which helps to explain why more than 15 years ago Crenshaw opted out of devoting three hours of her week to her hair.

''I had shoulder-length hair,'' she says. ''I will tell you as a woman of color it was hard to manage with my very active lifestyle. Every Saturday morning at 8 o'clock I would go to my stylist and she would wash and style my hair – a three-hour process.''

Crenshaw realized years ago that she just couldn't juggle that with raising a son and establishing herself as a local activist.

''It was a huge time commitment,'' she says. ''It was controlling me, instead of me controlling it, so I slowly took it shorter and shorter. Then I cut it all off and it was the most freeing experience.''

She followed that experience by becoming a community dynamo. And that work is not going unnoticed. On Thursday, Sept. 2, for example, she is being celebrated as an honoree at The Center, the metro area's LGBT community center, at its Fall Reception.

There was a time, however, when Crenshaw's growth was stifled.

Even though she knew she was a lesbian at a young age, followed by dating women openly throughout her youth, Crenshaw somehow ended up married to a man. However she ended up there, she eventually found the path back to herself.

METRO WEEKLY: What was it like growing up in Tulsa?

JUNE CRENSHAW: It was actually very – very – different from living here. The diversity is really limited. At the time, I think the stats were indicating that there was probably about a 5 percent minority rate. Oklahoma is in the Bible Belt, so certainly the mind frame and acceptance and diversity were very limited. But it was a nice, wholesome place to grow up, have family and friends. But not a whole lot of opportunities to grow beyond that point. And I just knew that my life was different and that I needed more opportunities than were available.

MW: When did you know you were different?

CRENSHAW: I had been dating women in my high school time, and I also had a girlfriend when I was in college. But there was lots of pressure, discomfort, and being in the closet.

I didn't want to live under the pressure of a very conservative area. I just wanted to be free and open and have more exposure to people that were like me and that weren't afraid to be open and out about being like me.

MW: What gave you the strength to be open in a conservative area like Tulsa?

CRENSHAW: I did have some very loving and supportive family. That could have made the difference and made me feel stronger about it.

But the girls that I dated were very uncomfortable with the situation. I know that there were pressures from their families to be what was considered the norm.

So the difference, I think, is only that I just knew emphatically who I was. I was okay with who I was. And those closest to me and important to me were okay with who I was. I think that gave me the strength to know that there was a better way of living and to move toward that.

MW: How did your family show their acceptance?

CRENSHAW: I actually have eight sisters and one brother. I come from a very, very large family. The ones that are close to me and loving, they were always supportive. The thing is I had to come out several times – not only to them, but to a lot of people.

I had a girlfriend in college and went through an extremely bad breakup. Then I got married to a man for a very short time. After I was married, of course all of my family thought that I was heterosexual and that everything was ''okay'' again. So having to come out again and sort of reaffirm and re-establish who I really am, that was a chaotic and confusing time for them. I did a lot of explaining, that I have always had the same preference to be with women, even when my actions didn't show that. That's not easy to comprehend and understand, but I think they got it for the most part.

MW: Did your bad breakup in college lead you to your marriage with that man?

CRENSHAW: Retrospectively, I think yes. I succumbed to the pressures of society for all of us to be heterosexual and married. I had a lot of challenges around relationships. Role models were just nonexistent for me. I really thought at the time that [marrying a man] would be easier, that this would just make life a breeze. I thought that if I could suppress my preference to be with a woman, then it would be okay. But that's not the way it turned out. It was actually extremely bad. But a very good lesson learned.

MW: Would you say that you were having an identity crisis?

CRENSHAW: I was not having an identity crisis, because my husband knew that I was a lesbian. He actually knew my ex. We were all kind of in the same circle. So what we thought we were doing was supporting each other. He cared about me. He knew that I was struggling with my relationship. I was really struggling in a lot of areas, and we thought let's get married and just make all of this pain and discomfort go away.

We thought that we could do that, we really did. But we couldn't. It just didn't work. I know that I couldn't have done it if I were in his position. I couldn't have dealt with the discomfort of knowing that my partner was attracted to some type that I could never be. That started to erode our relationship and our friendship. Once that erosion occurred, trust and support and just everything went down the drain. It was best to end that as civilly as we could.

MW: What was the breaking point for you?

CRENSHAW: I reached a point when I hated coming home. I hated being around him. There were so many parts of my life that were just overwhelming. I didn't feel as though, in that relationship, there was ever going to be a way to improve it.

It wasn't like a bad relationship that needed work or support or anything like that. We were just not on the same page in a lot of different areas. I reached that point when I realized that in some situations I was putting everybody else's needs, and ideas, and preferences, above my own. I wasn't making self a priority. My health was suffering, my motivation -- everything was just not right. Everything was out of sync.

I knew that I had to be true to myself. People will struggle with that in a lot of different ways. That's another reason I facilitate a coming-out group, because I know what that journey is like for so many people. I know that things seem just insurmountable, when there are different options and opportunities. We just need to open ourselves and open our eyes to those opportunities. Normally, they come along.

MW: You're referring to the group you facilitate at Whitman-Walker Clinic?

CRENSHAW: I do a 10-week, coming-out group for women at least three times a year. It's extremely popular, even in this day and age. It's a safe space for women to get together and ask questions, talk about what they're going through, share their experiences and also support other women.

MW: Is it difficult to hear their stories because of your past? Or do you find it empowering?

CRENSHAW: It actually is both. It's difficult to watch the struggling, the journey that a lot of women are going through. But the empowering thing is I know that – not only with the other women that I've been exposed to, but with my own journey – there is a way out, there are options. When the women come in and say, ''These things will never work for me, I will never be able to say that I'm lesbian, or I'm gay, or I'm bisexual or I'm transitioning,'' in the first week that they start meeting, by the end of it, they see that there are other options. Obviously we're not expecting at the end of 10 weeks for people to come out and be in the pride parade or anything like that. But we're expecting to strengthen them in their journey and provide resources and outlets and sources of support and information to them. So whatever their path, whatever they choose for their path, it's the right path for them and we support that.

There's no judgment and there's no expectation. It's just a place for them to sort of flourish and talk about what they're going through. Sometimes the women come in there and say, ''I've never said some of this stuff out loud and it is really empowering for me to get it out of my head and off of my heart and off of my shoulders, and also to find empathy by other women who are on that same journey.'' Sometimes in the same exact place in their journey. It's really wonderful to watch.

MW: You got a divorce?

CRENSHAW: I did.

MW: How did you re-establish yourself as a lesbian?

CRENSHAW: Just by changing who I partnered with. I met a woman and we had a long-term relationship. We bought a house and moved in together, in D.C. I moved away from [Tulsa] because I had to cut myself off from family and friends for a little bit of time, to kind of re-establish it in my head, with myself, and my own life.

MW: Why D.C.?

CRENSHAW: I moved here because a friend of mine lived here. I knew that I would have a jumping-off point as far as friends and support. With moving 2,000 miles away you kind of just need that. I worked at Avis [car rental] at National Airport. I rented a room in a house on Aspen Street, right across from Walter Reed hospital, and just immediately fell in love with the history, the trees, the changing of the seasons – just so many things about the city were just wonderful. Plus, there was a large and vibrant LGBTQ community. I moved here and just started doing different things, but I had a young son at the time. My son was 2 years old, so I was also a very active mother and focused on raising him and getting acclimated and settled and ready for starting school and all of those things.

It was really hard. One of the things that I didn't realize is the really strong network I had around raising him, with family members to help with daycare and with different things. Oddly enough, I didn't recognize the significance of that resource. I thought that I would move here and it would just be the same, I would have that same community, family, support – and I didn't.

In the early '90s, I met my now ex-partner. We had a 14-year relationship in which she helped to raise my son from about the age of 7. She came into his life and really was a godsend and is still very active in his life. So, yes, it was really challenging to find care and to know the right schools to get connected to, to understand the best neighborhoods and all of those things, but we figured it out.

MW: How would you describe your son today?

CRENSHAW: He is a thriving person, just a really strong, contributing citizen. He advocates for fairness as well. I remember when he went away to college at the University of Maryland in College Park. One of his classes had a required reading that had derogatory information in it about the LGBTQ community and he called me and he said, ''I am going to go to my advisors and tell them that I am extremely offended that I'm forced to read this very derogatory non-truth about the LGBT community.'' He said, ''I wonder if there are some gay people in my class.'' I told him there probably were, and that I was glad that he was strong enough to stand up and say, ''Listen, this is how this is making me feel, this is not right.'' One of the outcomes of that – not immediately – is that they made it an optional reading, not a required reading. That was a step in the right direction.

So I know that even though I was kind of doing it blindly, in an area in which I didn't know a lot of people or have a huge community of support, there were a lot of things that I did right. As a result, I'm very proud of who he is. I like him as a person. That's really, really important. He supports all of the things that I do, and he's very concerned about things that are going on at the clinic and at Rainbow Response. He's attuned to what's happening in the community and how it affects others.

MW: Did you have to have a conversation with him about being a lesbian?

CRENSHAW: I lived life openly and authentically so that he saw my relationships. He saw who I was. It wasn't anything foreign or unusual. He was immediately exposed to it. However, when he was 7 or 8, I decided to have a sort of sit-down conversation about it as well. Because this is what he had always been exposed to, he didn't really think that there was anything extremely unusual about it. As he became older, I think that there was certainly some peer pressure and discomfort around his parents. Kids reach a point where they want to be just like everybody else. They just don't want to stand out. He reached that point in life, but we were open and honest. Every year when we got all the packets for the school year and we had to fill out all the forms about who to contact and mother/father information, I meticulously went through and marked through all of the ''fathers'' and put my partner's name and changed it to ''partner'' and not ''husband/wife.''

My partner and I at the time would go to the PTA meetings, we would go to back-to-school night. They knew to reach one or the other and it didn't matter who or in what order, so they knew about the significance. But there was obviously some discomfort not only for [the school], but for him. Although I tried to do it in the most compassionate way as possible, I couldn't change how I lived to make other people comfortable.

MW: What led you to Whitman-Walker Clinic?

CRENSHAW: In the early 2000s, I was actually just looking for opportunities to volunteer. I had been volunteering for Heartly House, which is a center that deals with domestic violence, rape, sexual assault and child molestation. Their program, prior to my arrival, had really limited resources for same-sex couples. I worked really closely with the director there to make sure that their questioning and their outreach was sensitive to individuals that may be in that situation.

From there, I wanted to do different activities. I've always been a volunteer in a number of different capacities, so I wanted to get involved in the LGBTQ community, connect and make friends and do outreach. Not just go to parties and hang out at the clubs, but to really be more part of the community.

The clinic was the place to be. That was the word on the street: That's where you went if you wanted to connect with women that were doing things in the community.

MW: You took leadership as chair of Whitman-Walker Clinic's board during a difficult time, when the clinic was suffering financially and laying off some of its longest-serving staff members. What do you remember about that time?

CRENSHAW: It's pretty public that the clinic was experiencing some challenges. We have experienced some challenges over the last couple of years. Obviously Councilmember [David] Catania [D-At Large] is a very passionate supporter of the clinic. Although we've had some differences of opinion, the clinic really has benefited and grown from our relationship with him. At the time, the board was making some really, really tough decisions around the new business model that we had envisioned for the clinic. We were working to support the staff in developing a much more professional staff, and new processes and new procedures and all of those things were all happening at the same time. So we had some really tough decisions to make. In hindsight, there are certainly some things that we would have handled differently, but for the most part I feel as though we made the right decisions to keep the clinic viable. I think it's evident in how well we're doing now, and how the expertise has changed. We are still extremely committed to our mission around LGBT health and having a primary medical care center for everyone, and also being a center for individuals that have HIV/AIDS.

MW: Did you have any hesitation or anxiety in taking on the position at that time?

CRENSHAW: I had all kinds of anxiety and hesitation around it, for a number of different reasons. If you're familiar with any of the prior chairs – Jim Sandman, Jannette Williams – these were strong leaders in the community. They knew the history of the clinic, they were well supported. So there were some really big shoes to fill.

One of the things that I had said to the board when I was being considered is that there's only one way that I can be a success at this, and that is if the entire board feels as though it's the right decision. We certainly had to make sure that it was a collaborative effort. There were board members that had been around since the beginning, the early '80s. They had history. They had knowledge. They had passion about where the clinic was going, and that was essential to the board's success. So I was terrified, but felt positive that I had the full board's support. I felt positive that the leadership of the clinic was confident in my ability, so I was willing to step in and do it.

Let me tell you, it's been a rough couple of years. There are people that either love or hate the clinic. People have no problem coming up and giving me their opinion about the clinic and the leadership and the board. Sometimes that gets pretty scary, and it gets overwhelming.

MW: What's the scariest feedback that you've gotten?

CRENSHAW: That I need to watch my back.

MW: You've been threatened?

CRENSHAW: Yeah. But I've also had an opportunity to hear about all the positive things that the clinic has done and how it's impacted people's lives. I've heard some amazing stories about how people felt as though there was no place else to turn, there were no other options, and the clinic was again a place for them to get their health care, to get therapy service, to get all kinds of support that they needed to live a better life. And it has been life changing for a number of people. Those stories are really the ones that stand out the most.

MW: How do you go about building community trust again?

CRENSHAW: One person at a time. Making sure that they see that the clinic is doing the work that the mission has stated, that we are committed to the LGBTQ community, the community that's affected by HIV and AIDS, the community at large. We are really building an excellent health care facility that people can refer their friends and their families to, and that's important.

We are getting our story out. I think one of the lessons learned in this whole experience is that a lot of the messaging around Whitman-Walker has been extremely negative. We don't tell about the good work that we're doing and the ways in which we impact the community and the significance and the importance of the work that we're doing, and the expertise of the people who are doing that work. We don't really talk about that. We were extremely humble around those particular topics and now we know that we've got to get that message out.

MW: The clinic has been working to get the message out about its largest annual fundraiser, AIDS Walk. Have you participated in the walk before?

CRENSHAW: Probably seven or eight times.

MW: How do you prepare for it?

CRENSHAW: I go to the gym five days out of the week, so as far as physically it's a piece of cake. The big prep is to make sure that everybody that I know in my circle and beyond is aware of the importance of the AIDS Walk and that all of the money goes into to the clinic to help us to continue to serve people with HIV and AIDS, and that it is the largest fundraiser for us.

It's really important that we raise a lot of money, and raise a lot of awareness and create additional community support to sustain some very, very important programs. One of the things we're trying to do is exceed last year's goal, which we did extremely well in very economically challenging times. We need to improve that to get services and support to more people. We're doing it in some fun and creative ways, because you always have to reinvent yourself to your core customer base and bring in new people. We're doing that with Lynda Carter lending her name and prestige to this. We're so excited about that.

We're also doing this differently this year by having community partners. These community partners allow other HIV agencies and organizations to raise money when they don't necessarily have the internal resources as far as advertising and campaigning around it. So we're doing all the heavy lifting and they get to benefit by taking half of the funds that they raise, or their walkers raise. This really is a community-based event, and so this is an opportunity for us to get out and be a good neighbor and support other agencies that are doing similar work or that partner with us in some way to do the work.

MW: Your other volunteer work includes your role as co-chair of Rainbow Response, raising awareness of and reducing intimate-partner violence (IPV) in the LGBT community. How did that come about?

CRENSHAW: I have always been extremely passionate about intimate-partner violence and stopping that in whatever way that I can. I knew that there was a huge gap in our community for education and services and resources to survivors that have dealt with IPV. We had places that were okay with members of the LGBTQ community, but that didn't really have programs to address our unique needs. It was exciting to be a part of [addressing] that.

I've been a part of Rainbow Response since its origin in 2007 and we've done some really awesome work with outreach and education to the community. Twice a year we'll do town-hall type meetings and different educational situations. We've gone to [George Washington University] and Morgan State [University] and the University of the District of Columbia, and just a number of different ways that we've outreached to educate people that this does happen in our community at the same rate that it happens in the heterosexual community. We don't have the resources and support that we need to get our survivors and victims out of those situations and to educate those first responders on knowing when there is a situation, to treat it as serious as it is.

Unfortunately, we lost a couple of members of the community to domestic-violence situations, so it was important to get out and speak out about this issue that we were having. The community doesn't want to talk about the bad things that happen. I get that and I understand – but they are happening. Our relationships deserve all of the resources and time and intention and support that any relationship would have. That means that we need to know how to have healthier relationships. We need to know how to create those. We don't have, often, role models on which to mimic our relationships. Sometimes they go down the wrong path, and we need to change that.

MW: Are LGBT people more reluctant to talk about IPV?

CRENSHAW: We're significantly more reluctant just because of homophobia. Sometimes we're not out, and reporting these types of crimes seems as though it's going to push us out of the closet. In addition, we do want to present our relationships as not having these types of issues. A lot of people feel as though it's a black mark against the community, or we're not doing what we need to do to sort of keep our dirty laundry in the closet. And sometimes people really don't understand the power and control situation around domestic violence. People have been in domestic-violence situations and they haven't recognized it themselves.

We're much more reluctant because of a number of reasons, but the major one is we don't think we're going to get support from the police or the services that are offered. We know that our community is still homophobic to a certain degree and won't necessarily take us seriously. And we may not be out and comfortable with the relationship. All of those things tend to make us be less likely to report.

MW: Why are you passionate about this issue?

CRENSHAW: Because I am passionate about us having happy, healthy, relationships. I'm passionate because I think that we don't mentor our young LGBTQ community and see what things should look like. It's just such an area that has gotten little focus and is so, so important. I knew one of the victims that died, the young lady that was shot right outside of Safeway. She was not an extremely close friend, but I knew her. And that was just an unacceptable situation.

MW: Did you testify before the D.C. City Council in favor of marriage equality for some of those same reasons?

CRENSHAW: It's just about fairness and equality. We needed to have enough voices. The other thing was that there was certainly a lot of media attention around the [assertion] that this was not a people-of-color issue, that this was not a really a lesbian issue, that this was an issue affecting only the affluent, white, gay population. And that's just not true. We're all affected. We're all struggling and striving to make a better life for ourselves and for our children and for our friends and families.

MW: As you continue to make a difference, where are some other areas you'd like to be involved?

CRENSHAW: I'm doing a lot of things that I'm passionate about. I see that certainly continuing. I do want to get more involved on a national level and some of the efforts that the [National Gay and Lesbian] Task Force and the Human Rights Campaign are working on. We need more voices out there. There are never too many. I want to add mine to the pot.

I also want to create some mentoring programs particularly for LGBT people of color to create our future leaders and support those individuals that have similar passions and commitments to the community, and figure out ways to particularly support the women of color in the LTB community. We shouldn't be reinventing the wheel. We have so many resources out there that people should be able to tap into. I want to build camaraderie and togetherness and much more of a cohesive community than we have. Those are some of the things I hope to see in the second half of my life.

The Center's Fall Reception is Thursday, Sept. 2, at 6:30 p.m. at the Artists Inn Residence, 1824 R St. NW. Tickets are $50. Visit thedccenter.org or call 202-682-2245.

For more information about the 2010 AIDS Walk, call 202-332-9255 or visitaidswalkwashington.org. For more about the Rainbow Response Coalition, visitrainbowresponse.org. For more information about support groups at Whitman-Walker Clinic, call 202-745-7000 or visit wwc.org.

MPD Training Returns: Member of Rainbow Response says IPV training gives police helpful LGBT insights

posted Sep 14, 2010 7:01 PM by Thomas Buckley   [ updated Feb 25, 2012 3:47 PM by Rainbow Response Administrator ]

by Yusef Najafi; MetroWeekly; Published on July 1, 2010 <Original Article>

It's not easy to determine who is the primary aggressor in an intimate-partner violence (IPV) situation involving same-gender couples, says Amy Loudermilk.

''What we're seeing is that it's much harder for anybody to figure out who is really the aggressor in LGBT cases, where it's not as hard in heterosexual cases,'' says Loudermilk, who serves as co-chair of the Rainbow Response Coalition, which works to quell intimate-partner violence among LGBT people.

''We can generally tell if there are big size differences in people. Offensive marks and defensive marks are going to show up differently in people who are of much different sizes. But in LGBT cases … you have to rely on other indicators, in addition to the physical indicators, to figure out who is the primary aggressor.''

Rainbow Response introduced those other indicators to nearly 30 Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) officers, on Wednesday, June 16, during the second round of training for officers affiliated with MPD's Special Liaison Units (SLU), which include the Gay and Lesbian Liaison Unit (GLLU). The first round of SLU training took place during five days in November and December 2009.

''We're trying to avoid officers coming to a scene and seeing injuries on both parties and then just arresting both parties.''

Loudermilk says Rainbow Response collaborated with current members of the GLLU as well as MPD generally in preparing materials for the training, which included two days of ''in-class instructions'' and one field day.

''We relied on their feedback and their expertise about where officers are coming from. It helped inform our curriculum and I think that's why our hour of training went so well. We had a much better idea of where people were coming from.''

Other organizations that participated in the training included Gays and Lesbian Opposing Violence, Transgender Health Empowerment and the Sexual Minority Youth Assistance League.

Loudermilk says she feels ''encouraged'' by the partnership Rainbow Response has formed with MPD.

''We've developed a very strong partnership with [MPD continuing-education director] Eric Waldt, and he's actually talking about repeating this training on a quarterly basis and then expanding it so that all of MPD gets this training.''

For more information about Rainbow Response, visit rainbowresponse.org.


Amy Loudermilk: From terror in childhood, to community defender

posted Sep 14, 2010 6:59 PM by Thomas Buckley   [ updated Feb 25, 2012 3:47 PM by Rainbow Response Administrator ]

by Yusef Najafi; MetroWeekly; Published April 29, 2010 <Original Article>

Next Generation Awards 2010

By the time she was 10, Amy Loudermilk knew that phoning her best friend and getting a busy signal meant one thing: danger.

''Her parents were involved in a domestic-violence situation,'' Loudermilk says, ''and her father, the abuser, had a habit of unplugging all of the phones whenever something bad was going on.''

Loudermilk would keep calling until she got through.

One day in the sixth grade when she didn't get through, the Gaithersburg resident made the 10-minute walk to her friend's house to help.

''I walked in the house," Loudermilk recalls. "It was during the afternoon. All of the lights were out and her father was sitting at the kitchen table with his gun.''

Somehow Loudermilk was able to walk upstairs and escort her friend back to her own home without attracting the father's attention.

Those childhood encounters dealing with domestic violence set Loudermilk on a path that would lead her to the Rainbow Response Coalition, where since 2008 she has been volunteering as co-chair. The coalition is made up of organizations, leaders, government agencies and domestic-violence service providers, collaborating to raise awareness about intimate-partner violence (IPV) in the relationships of LGBT people in D.C.

''Just seeing the realities of [my friend's] life, and trying to help her...affected me a lot, but at the time I still didn't think that's what I wanted to dedicate my life to.''

Loudermilk also works full time as senior policy specialist among a team of nine at the DC Coalition Against Domestic Violence, from the group's office inside the National City Christian Church at Thomas Circle. The coalition advocates for local legislation in front of the D.C. City Council, as well as for funds for domestic-violence service providers in the city.

''We also do system-reform work,'' Loudermilk adds, ''which is where a lot of my work on LGBTQ [issues] comes in: How can you make the system, as a whole, better and responsive for survivors? I get to do a little bit of work on LGBTQ domestic-violence issues, but obviously not as much as I would love to. That's why I do it outside of my normal work hours as well.''

It wasn't until Loudermilk worked part time at the House of Ruth, a shelter for domestic-violence victims in D.C. that she found her calling.

''I always knew that I wanted to do political work and some sort of work to change the realities of society,'' she says. ''There were a number of issues that I was really passionate about -- and I'm still passionate about -- so I had no idea how I was going to narrow it down to one issue.''

Working at the shelter helped. She couldn't help but ponder what domestic-violence services looked like for LGBT people in the District.

''I started to think, 'Are there service agencies? Are there specialized services? Service providers? Where do they go?' And then just beginning to do a little bit of research into that really sparked my interest.''

In addition to taking on those questions, Loudermilk's work with the Rainbow Response Coalition in D.C. has included efforts to train the Metropolitan Police Department's officers about IPV issues among LGBT people.

''We have made really fantastic inroads with the MPD,'' Loudermilk says. ''We've really strengthened our relationship recently, so I'm hoping to do -- in addition to more training -- more standardized information and data collection, because there actually aren't very many police departments across the country that track incidences of LGBTQ domestic violence.

''That's really problematic in the grant world, because you can't show that there are the appropriate numbers of victims to justify a grant request. It's hard to know if you're responding to the need, and what are the trends, without data. That's one of my top priorities: just to begin to even get a sense of what are the numbers in D.C.''

Of her recognition as a Next Generation Award winner, Loudermilk says, ''I had never gotten an award like this before. It's my first one. I was very excited, but felt maybe not as deserving as some other people might be.''

While she works in D.C. and is fond of the city, Loudermilk refuses to live in the District until voting representation is granted to its citizens.

She currently resides in Gaithersburg with her two cats.

''I don't have a lot of downtime because I'm one of those people that is so passionate about this that pretty much if I have a free minute I want to be doing something to further this along. Also, doing this work, it's really difficult work. It's tough work and it's very emotional, so you do have to put limits on it and take breaks sometimes.''

For Loudermilk that means spending a quiet evening at home, reading.

''All of the other people who I know who do this work, the kind of stuff that they read is fluffy beach novels and romance," says Loudermilk. "But I'll go and grab a true-crime book. People will just think I'm nuts -- but that's what I do.''

New GLLU officers welcomed at reception

posted Sep 14, 2010 6:57 PM by Thomas Buckley

by Lou Chibbaro Jr; Washington Blade; Published on April 1, 2010 <Original Article>

More than one dozen recently designated affiliate members of the D.C. police’s Gay & Lesbian Liaison Unit were formally introduced March 25 during a reception at the D.C. Center.

Close to two dozen GLLU affiliate officers, who work out of the department’s seven police districts throughout the city, are part of Police Chief Cathy Lanier’s plan to expand and decentralize the unit.

“This is just the beginning,” said Assistant D.C. Police Chief Diane Groomes. “Chief Lanier would say this is a work in progress.”

Groomes said more officers have expressed an interest in joining the GLLU than any of the other special liaison units, including the Latino, Asian & Pacific Islander, and Deaf & Hard of Hearing units.

The reception was hosted by the D.C. Center; Gays & Lesbians Opposing Violence, a center project; and Rainbow Response, a local coalition that advocates for LGBT people victimized by domestic violence. GLLU officials have said that the largest percentage of calls the unit receives for assistance are related to domestic violence matters.

Kelly Pickard, GLOV’s co-chair, told the gathering that her group is hopeful that the expanded GLLU and its newly designated members will help local activists more aggressively combat anti-LGBT hate crimes. She noted that D.C. has the largest number of anti-LGBT hate crimes recorded among most U.S. cities.

“You are heroic in what you do, day and night,” she told officers at the reception.

Rainbow Response official June Crenshaw echoed Pickard’s sentiments, saying, “We depend on you.”


GLLU meet and greet

posted Sep 14, 2010 6:55 PM by Thomas Buckley

by Michael Key; Washington Blade; Published on March 26, 2010 <Original Article>

Officers representing the D.C. police’s Gay & Lesbian Liaison Unit met with community members Thursday at the D.C. Center. Officers introduced themselves and representatives of Gays & Lesbians Opposing Violence and Rainbow Response talked about the need to work more closely together with the unit and other D.C. police officers. Singer and songwriter Tom Goss performed during the event.

Criticism Continues: Lack of input leaves LGBT activists feeling like "an afterthought" in police liaison unit training

posted Sep 14, 2010 6:50 PM by Thomas Buckley   [ updated Feb 25, 2012 3:48 PM by Rainbow Response Administrator ]

by Yusef Najafi; MetroWeekly; Published on December 2, 2009 <Original Article>

Chris Farris of Gays and Lesbians Opposing Violence (GLOV) feels like an afterthought.

He was given only three days to prepare to speak at a training seminar for a group of about 60 Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) officers training in services offered for the MPD’s Special Liaison Units (SLU), which includes the city’s Gay and Lesbian Liaison Unit (GLLU).

“Community members want to be involved, but we don’t want to be an afterthought,” Farris says. “Here, we were definitely an afterthought.”

It was about a month ago when Farris and other community members attempted to help prepare the curriculum for the training by offering input and suggestions during a meeting called for by Mayor Adrian M. Fenty’s liaison to the LGBT community, Christopher Dyer.

But their input was apparently not used, and MPD Chief Cathy Lanier set a five-day training -- increased from an originally announced 32 hours to 40 -- which began Nov. 30.

“We’ve had no input into the curriculum, no review of the curriculum, no explanation about what the curriculum was going to cover, nothing like that.”

While Farris says he is disappointed in the MPD’s failure to “seek adequate input” from LGBT community members, and Lanier for paying “an enormous amount of lip service to the community with basically zero follow up,” it’s not going to stop him from speaking to the officers taking the SLU training at the Metropolitan Police Academy.

“I don’t want anyone to mistake my participation as an endorsement of the training, because it’s simply not,” he says of his involvement. “I’m doing it because it’s all we’ve been offered and … I can do my best to help impress upon these new GLLU officers the importance of their work and the strong desire that GLOV and other community groups have in forming a partnership with them. It’s my only chance.”

Amy Loudermilk and David Phillips, both of Rainbow Response, took the same chance, but with only one day to prepare. They spoke to officers in the SLU training about the important role that the GLLU has played in dealing with intimate-partner violence (IPV).

“I almost don’t even know where to begin,” Loudermilk says when asked about her concerns with the current curriculum.

“I can tell you that there were factual errors in the domestic-violence training,” she says, referring to an hour-long Power Point presentation that preceded Loudermilk and Phillips's speech and left out “domestic partners” in the categories of people who are often victims of domestic violence, "which is really relevant if you’re training GLLU officers. Therefore it was inaccurate.”

Phillips says he is concerned that officers will not be prepared to handle upcoming events that draw a large LGBT crowd to Washington, including the Mid-Atlantic Leather Weekend in January, and the 2012 AIDS Conference, which he says will draw about 30,000 people. And while he’s optimistic that the MPD will continue to use community resources such as Rainbow Response for information, his thoughts on the training have not changed.

“It was hastily thrown together and there was no review by outside subject experts.”

Kevin Palmer, from the MPD's Public Information Office, said Assistant Chief Diane Groomes would be available to comment on the training, only after its initial run, which concludes with field study on Dec. 4. No further information or training materials were available from the MPD.


Open-House Anger: LGBT community challenges MPD's plans for GLLY for starters

posted Sep 14, 2010 6:47 PM by Thomas Buckley   [ updated Feb 25, 2012 3:48 PM by Rainbow Response Administrator ]

by Will O'Bryan; MetroWeekly; Published on November 17, 2009 <Original Article>

Despite the lure of an unseasonably temperate evening, about 60 people chose to remain indoors to hear what Assistant Chief Diane Groomes of the Metropolitan Police Department might have to say to the LGBT community -- and to present their own concerns to her.

After moderator Christopher Dyer, director of the Mayor's Office of GLBT Affairs, welcomed the crowd, Groomes offered some details of a training to be given at the end of the month to orient a handful of officers with the MPD special liaison units – the Gay and Lesbian Liaison Unit (GLLU) among them. Longtime local activist Peter Rosenstein's comments immediately afterward did not set the tone, but they were fairly indicative of what was to follow.

''Clearly the effort hasn't been put in with the community or the force to put this together,'' Rosenstein said, excusing Groomes for taking the heat he said MPD Chief Cathy Lanier had earned. ''We're getting a program that hasn't been thought through.''

The training, as Groomes explained it during this MPD Open House at the Reeves Center, will last four days. The first three days will be dedicated to content applicable to officers who will serve in any of the liaison units (Asian, Latino, Deaf/Hard of Hearing, or the GLLU), with the last day offering specialized training in a particular unit.

While Groomes noted that of the 57 officers who had signed up for the training, they represented all the MPD districts and 23 had asked for the GLLU training specifically. The audience, which included Councilmembers Michael Brown (I-At Large) and Phil Mendelson (D-At Large), along with At-Large candidate Clark Ray, deflated those figures, however, with questions about the numbers of officers on the force -- 4,050 -- meaning .6 percent of the force asked for GLLU training.

Those gathered seemed more bothered, however, that the model for the GLLU -- a model that was acclaimed by Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government in 2005 -- that saw a number of officers fully dedicated to the unit, was being transformed into an entity with fewer dedicated officers, though with more officers having GLLU training.

Or, as June Crenshaw of Rainbow Response asked, why was this training not mandatory for the entire police force?

Certainly, that training would seem necessary if Sampson McCormick's story was any indication. He told the crowd of a night in March when he was walking guests at his house in Anacostia to a nearby bus stop following a party. They were confronted by a group of youths.

''We jacked them boys up and held them until the cops came,'' he said to applause. ''And they let them go.''

Sampson also accused the officers in that instance of making homophobic comments about some of his friends and saying they were unfamiliar with the GLLU.

''They said it didn't exist, and that really bothered me.''

Lindy Garnett of Metro-D.C. PFLAG (Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays) was also bothered, primarily by what she was hearing that evening. Where Groomes said the new training is voluntary because, ''We want to make sure we have the right people who want to do it,'' Garnett countered that in most occupations, instruction on what needs to be done, rather than willingness, should suffice.

Voicing what seemed obvious by the end of the evening, Garnett concluded, ''If nothing else, you have a huge public relations problem.''


1-10 of 14

Greater DC Coalition to Address Intimate Partner Violence in the LGBTQ Communities

Rainbow Response Coalition is not an agent, employee, subsidiary, nor does it have any authority to act on behalf of DC Coalition Against Domestic Violence except to receive donations on it’s behalf.